Ludovic Courtès writes: > Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> skribis: > >> Chad Albers writes: > > [...] > >>> b. More robust documentation system - texinfo is not the greatest. And >>> it's non-trivial to generate any documentation (including texinfo) for >>> modules. >> >> Texinfo is pretty nice to use if you're an emacs user... in fact, if >> you're an emacs user, it's the best documentation reading system in the >> world. But not everyone's an emacs user. > > I think Texinfo is OK even if you’re not an Emacs user, no? Especially > with the just-release 6.1 where menus can (finally!) be automatically > generated. > >> If the html export was nicely themed > > It can be nicely themed. FWIW, Gnulib’s gendocs.sh, which is what most > projects use to export their HTML to gnu.org, now includes a CSS by > default (see <https://gnu.org/s/guix/manual> as an example.) We can > change this CSS anytime, and in fact, I would love it if someone > talented would come up with improvements!
Relatedly, see this very conversation happening about theming in emacs-land right now! https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-02/msg00361.html
