On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> skribis: >> >>> Chad Albers writes: >> >> [...] >> >>>> b. More robust documentation system - texinfo is not the greatest. And >>>> it's non-trivial to generate any documentation (including texinfo) for >>>> modules. >>> >>> Texinfo is pretty nice to use if you're an emacs user... in fact, if >>> you're an emacs user, it's the best documentation reading system in the >>> world. But not everyone's an emacs user. >> >> I think Texinfo is OK even if you’re not an Emacs user, no? Especially >> with the just-release 6.1 where menus can (finally!) be automatically >> generated. >> >>> If the html export was nicely themed
IMHO, HTML has clearly won the documentation game. I believe it goes without saying that most developers have a web browser installed, rather than a textinfo reader. The more the guile project publishes easily searchable (without google) documentation in the most accessible media format the better for guile. -- Chad Albers
