Thompson, David writes: >> I'm a big fan of CI (automated testing), and maybe you are too. I'd >> love to have CI for reviewing patches of Guile. > > This is a good idea.
+1 > That's unfortunate. It's important to build from scratch, which means > bootstrapping the compiler, which indeed takes awhile, but patches > generally take days or longer to be reviewed and merged so a few hours > is no big deal, IMO. The GNU Guix project is working on a replacement > for its current CI system at hydra.gnu.org that runs Hydra from the > Nix project, named Cuirass, so I think we should try to use that > instead of GitLab. I so much like this idea, that I contributed some patches to Cuirass to do exactly this. Next to being a CI dedicated for GuixSD to track any package's git. Here's the discussion https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/threads.html#01338 patches are in Cuirass now and anyone is much encouraged to play. > I think this is a wonderful idea that could use a new implementation. > Thanks for getting the ball rolling with the proof-of-concept! Yes! Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl