-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:47:08AM +0100, Jan Synáček wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:36 AM, <to...@tuxteam.de> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:31:23AM +0100, Jan Synáček wrote: > >> Hello,
[...] > > Are you building from scratch? Because then yes, 2.1.x is expected > > to bootstrap slowly [1]. The solution offered ATM is delivering a > > half-bootstrapped system [2]. > > Yes, but even a small (about 3 modules and a few 100s LoC) project of > mine compiles about 3 times slower. You mean not bootstrapping the system but using a fully bootstrapped Guile to compile *your* stuff? Hmmm. > > TL;DR the compiler has become much smarter, but also tougher to > > build (but read the refs anyway: they're a worthy read). > > > > regards > > > > [1] > > https://wingolog.org/archives/2016/01/11/the-half-strap-self-hosting-and-guile > > [2] https://wingolog.org/archives/2016/02/04/guile-compiler-tasks > > Thank you, I wasn't aware of these. Good to know that it's not a bug. I'm far from being in the position to decide whether there's a bug, alas. Perhaps more knowledgeable folks could chime in: Is a factor of 3 when compiling to be expected? regards - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlg7+hwACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYM3ACfZpBENm0jEorf5T45Qz5nxDIy GIAAn0HjqJd+OMX8eQQt1WLCor7S0ewp =DGQp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
