On Sun, February 28, 2010 23:59, Neil Jerram wrote: > This is really a stab in the dark - but could you try using a name for > the Scheme-level procedure that is different from the module name? > Currently they are both "mytest". > > I think there could be some residual nonsense meaning for a binding that > has the same name as the module...
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried changing the name in the "define_gsubr" and "export" statements and it made no difference. But it's ok. Compiling my own binary is fine for what I am doing. I'm not sure why I bother so much about this in the first place. Maybe I should have my head looked at. /Tomas
