"Tomas By" <to...@basun.net> writes:
> On Sun, February 28, 2010 23:59, Neil Jerram wrote:
>> This is really a stab in the dark - but could you try using a name for
>> the Scheme-level procedure that is different from the module name?
>> Currently they are both "mytest".
>>
>> I think there could be some residual nonsense meaning for a binding that
>> has the same name as the module...
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried changing the name in the "define_gsubr"
> and "export" statements and it made no difference.
>
> But it's ok. Compiling my own binary is fine for what I am doing. I'm not
> sure why I bother so much about this in the first place. Maybe I should
> have my head looked at.
OK, fine. But please do come and ask us again if you need to, and we'll
have another go.
Neil
