That raises to connotation that there can be multiple of something: none, one, many. Maybe "nothing" really is the best option. After all, "nihil" is just Latin for "nothing", so I might as well use English.
> none?
That raises to connotation that there can be multiple of something: none, one, many. Maybe "nothing" really is the best option. After all, "nihil" is just Latin for "nothing", so I might as well use English.
> none?