Hi! I can’t build it because it depends on freeglut, on your message about freeglut hasn’t yet reached the mailing list.
So, initial comments inline below: "Joshua \"Youlysses\" S. Grant" <[email protected]> skribis: > ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU > ;;; Copyright © 2013 Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> This is wrong. :-) > (define-module (gnu packages ftgl) > #:use-module (guix licenses) > #:use-module (guix packages) > #:use-module (guix download) > #:use-module (guix build-system gnu) > #:use-module (gnu packages) > #:use-module (gnu packages xorg) > #:use-module (gnu packages fontutils) ;;The licenses module calls freetype > (and it warns me), but dosen't seem to work without explicitly called as an > input. To address that, use a #:renamer (to rename one of the conflicting bindings) or #:select (to select the one you want). Grep the other packages for examples. > (define-public ftgl ;Should expression move to fontutils, xorg, or keep here? Or maybe we could have gl.scm, which would contain freeglut, glu, ftgl, and all that? > (package > (name "ftgl") > (version "2.1.3-rc5") > (source (origin > (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append > "mirror://sourceforge/project/ftgl/FTGL%20Source/2.1.3~rc5/ftgl-" > version ".tar.gz")) > (sha256 > (base32 > "0nsn4s6vnv5xcgxcw6q031amvh2zfj2smy1r5mbnjj2548hxcn2l")))) > (build-system gnu-build-system) > (inputs `(("freetype" ,freetype) > ("libx11" ,libx11) > ("mesa" ,mesa) > ("glu" ,glu))) > (home-page > "http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ftgl/index.php?title=Main_Page";) > http://ftgl.sourceforge.net maybe? > (synopsis "A font rendering library for OpenGL applications. ") Rather: “Font rendering library for OpenGL applications” (that is: no “A”, and no period.) > (description > "FTGL is a font rendering library for OpenGL applications. Supported > rendering modes are: > Bitmaps, Anti-aliased pixmaps, Texture maps, Outlines, Polygon > meshes, and Extruded polygon meshes") > (license lgpl2.0))) ;Mit or Lgpl at your option, not sure how, or if > one can currently dual-license. If it’s LGPL version 2.0 *or later*, make sure to use ‘lgpl2.0+’. Overall this looks like a good start! Indentation is wrong: please check ‘Coding Style’ in the ‘HACKING’ file and/or existing package definitions in the other files. Thanks! Ludo’.
