guix-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Liam Hupfer
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Tomas Volf
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Liam Hupfer
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. indieterminacy
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Liam Hupfer
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Efraim Flashner
  • Re: Revisiting the "ChangeLog" style. Andreas Enge
• Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Hilton Chain
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Hilton Chain
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Hilton Chain
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Hilton Chain
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Liam Hupfer
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Hilton Chain
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Andreas Enge
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Hilton Chain
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Leo Famulari
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Ricardo Wurmus
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Liam Hupfer
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Ricardo Wurmus
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Hilton Chain
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Ricardo Wurmus
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Ricardo Wurmus
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Andreas Enge
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Tomas Volf
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Thoughts on setting a minimum requirement for committing changes, and the contribution model in general. Noé Lopez
  • Let's streamline the review process Hilton Chain
• xlibre X11 server spacecadet
  • Re: xlibre X11 server indieterminacy
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Gabriel Santos
  • Re: xlibre X11 server jbranso
  • Re: xlibre X11 server λx . x
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Aurora
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Noé Lopez
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Noé Lopez
  • Re: xlibre X11 server indieterminacy
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Ian Eure
  • Re: xlibre X11 server spacecadet
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Ian Eure
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Lapearldot
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Rutherther
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Rutherther
  • How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Efraim Flashner
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server spacecadet
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server spacecadet
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server indieterminacy
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Lapearldot
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Lapearldot
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Lapearldot
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Lapearldot
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server pinoaffe
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server spacecadet
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: What do we mean by free André Batista
  • Re: How (not to) deal with upstreams that have _extremely_ toxic maintainership Was: xlibre X11 server Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Vivien Kraus
  • Re: xlibre X11 server Vivien Kraus
• Which build system for running a script? Konrad Hinsen
  • Re: Which build system for running a script? Rutherther
  • Re: Which build system for running a script? Konrad Hinsen
• Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Andrew Wong
  • Re: Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Noé Lopez
  • Re: Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Hilton Chain
  • Re: Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Hilton Chain
  • Re: Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Sergio Pastor Pérez
  • Re: Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Noé Lopez
  • Re: Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Sergio Pastor Pérez
  • Re: Implementing the XDG Autostart Specification Noé Lopez
• Loosely aligning work on IRC? Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: Loosely aligning work on IRC? Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
• Wrong signed-off-by fotter. Sharlatan Hellseher
• Help a Channel Out? (emacs-master) Gabriel Santos
  • Re: Help a Channel Out? (emacs-master) Liliana Marie Prikler
  • Re: Help a Channel Out? (emacs-master) Gabriel Santos
  • Re: Help a Channel Out? (emacs-master) Gabriel Santos
• Re: Updating Docker to v27 Sharlatan Hellseher
• Forgejo: branch master is protected from unverified commit Greg Hogan
  • Re: Forgejo: branch master is protected from unverified commit Z572
  • Re: Forgejo: branch master is protected from unverified commit Greg Hogan
  • Re: Forgejo: branch master is protected from unverified commit Greg Hogan
• Update your Guix! Privilege escalation vulnerabilities fixed John Kehayias
• [Non GCD] Changing GCD headers Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Package with multiple source repositories Konrad Hinsen
  • Re: Package with multiple source repositories Noé Lopez
  • Re: Package with multiple source repositories Jake
  • Re: Package with multiple source repositories Konrad Hinsen
• GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Steve George
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Noé Lopez
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Divya Ranjan
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Z572
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Andreas Enge
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Efraim Flashner
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: [bug#78332] GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Simon Tournier
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Vinicius Monego
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Jelle Licht
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Christopher Baines
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Greg Hogan
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Hilton Chain
  • Re: [bug#78332] GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Leo Famulari
  • Re: GCD005: Regular and efficient releases (consideration/decision) Eric Bavier
• Spurious (?) branches on Codeberg Andreas Enge
  • Re: Spurious (?) branches on Codeberg Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Spurious (?) branches on Codeberg Andreas Enge
  • Re: Spurious (?) branches on Codeberg Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Spurious (?) branches on Codeberg Ashish SHUKLA
  • Re: Spurious (?) branches on Codeberg Vagrant Cascadian
• Multischeme bindigs for wayland packed in guix Grigory Shepelev
  • Re: Multischeme bindigs for wayland packed in guix Maxim Cournoyer
• Upcoming security disclosures on June 24, 2025 Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Tomas Volf
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Tomas Volf
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Mark H Weaver
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Tomas Volf
  • Re: Sunsetting of guix-commits mailing list? Maxim Cournoyer
• config.scm-builder and content-address? Simon Tournier
  • Re: config.scm-builder and content-address? Ludovic Courtès
• Reducing “guix pull” error reports, toward a plan? Simon Tournier
  • Re: Reducing “guix pull” error reports, toward a plan? Andreas Enge
  • Re: Reducing “guix pull” error reports, toward a plan? Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Reducing “guix pull” error reports, toward a plan? Vagrant Cascadian
• Ergonomics of local development ingar
• Guile needs your help Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: Guile needs your help Olivier Dion
  • Re: Guile needs your help Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Guile needs your help Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: Guile needs your help Olivier Dion
  • Re: Guile needs your help Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: Guile needs your help Attila Lendvai
  • Re: Guile needs your help Olivier Dion
  • Re: Guile needs your help Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Guile needs your help Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Guile needs your help Zhu Zihao
  • Re: Guile needs your help Thompson, David
  • Re: Guile needs your help Ekaitz Zarraga
  • Re: Guile needs your help pinoaffe
  • Re: Guile needs your help Ekaitz Zarraga
• Making login manager removable and/or selectable Danny Milosavljevic
• Teams migration on Codeberg Gabriel Wicki
  • Re: Teams migration on Codeberg Andreas Enge
  • Re: Teams migration on Codeberg Hilton Chain
  • Re: Teams migration on Codeberg Noé Lopez
  • Re: Teams migration on Codeberg Andreas Enge
• GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Liliana Marie Prikler
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Ludovic Courtès
  • System without GDM [was: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd] Andreas Enge
  • Re: System without GDM [was: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd] Liliana Marie Prikler
  • Re: System without GDM [was: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd] Ian Eure
  • Re: System without GDM [was: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd] Tomas Volf
  • Re: System without GDM [was: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd] Danny Milosavljevic
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Rutherther
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Rutherther
  • Re: GNOME 49’s dependencies on systemd Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Milestones on CodeBerg Sharlatan Hellseher
  • Re: Milestones on CodeBerg Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Milestones on CodeBerg Efraim Flashner
• linux-libre 6.15 Leo Famulari
  • Re: linux-libre 6.15 Jordan Moore
  • Re: linux-libre 6.15 Jordan Moore
  • Re: linux-libre 6.15 Leo Famulari
  • Re: linux-libre 6.15 Efraim Flashner
  • Re: linux-libre 6.15 Leo Famulari

• Earlier messages
• Later messages