Andreas Enge <[email protected]> skribis: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:14:47AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> So that means GTK+ 3 actually works, right? That’s cool! > > This is a good question, since none of the packages I am interested in > uses gtk+ so far. But I am working on packaging one ;-) > > I tried to use the slideshow binary from the racket package; it fails with > ffi-lib: couldn't open "libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0" (libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory) > context...: > So it also requires gtk+-2; apparently an error in the configure script. > I will also revert this back.
OK. > xnee has only one binary, cnee, which fails for me with > Error number: 6 > Error: Wrong paramters > Description: You have given invalid input to Xnee > Argument: (NO ARG) > At least, it does not look gtk+-related. On the other hand, "ldd cnee" > does not show anything gtk+-related either, nor does "guix gc --references"; > so maybe the input gtk+ is not actually used at all? I think Xnee has an optional gnee program (or something like that) that provides a GTK+ GUI. But maybe it explicitly checks for gtk+-2.0 and just disables that when that is not found? I’ll check if Geeqie works and report back. Ludo’.
