Thompson, David (2015-08-06 15:22 +0300) wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Alex Kost <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thompson, David (2015-08-02 15:51 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Ah, of course, I forgot about something: This patch triggers a >>> rebuild of *everything* now! I guess it should be applied to >>> core-updates. Or, the first patch I submitted can be applied to >>> master, and then a patch that moves 'regular-file?' to (guix build >>> utils) can be applied to core-updates later. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> In my opinion it is redundant to use another commit here, so I would >> apply this patch to core-updates (taking into account Andreas' note). >> But I don't really know how such situations are handled. Mark should >> know better. > > The reason I want two commits is strategic. This first patch can go > into master *now*, without breaking anything or causing a full > rebuild. Moving that procedure into (guix build utils) is nice, but > not strictly necessary. I am trying to get basic container support in > shape and into master. Waiting on a core-updates cycle would just > stall the process.
Ah, OK, I don't mind then. -- Alex
