Thanks for your comments! On Sun, Aug 30, 2015, at 16:05, Alex Kost wrote:> > Ah, sorry, I read this after replying to your 'llfuse' patch. I agree > on separating fuse module, as there are several fuse-related packages > (sshfs-fuse, unionfs-fuse, fuse-exfat).
The reasoning behind meta-modules like python.scm, backup.scm, or a potential fuse.scm is not clear to me — there are some Python programs in their own modules or in other meta-modules. Ditto for prepending "python-" to certain module names and not others. Anyway, if there is a consensus on what to do about llfuse, I will submit a revised patchset. Right now it seems that the choices are either: 1) llfuse.scm (this patchset would do this) 2) put it in python.scm as python-llfuse 3) create fuse.scm and put it in there along with some other fuse-related modules. In the meantime, I will prepare revisions to address your other comments.
