Alex Kost <[email protected]> skribis: > Leo Famulari (2015-08-26 20:16 +0300) wrote:
[...] >> + (description "Python-LLFUSE is a set of Python bindings for the low level >> +FUSE API. It requires at least FUSE 2.8.0 and supports both Python 2.x and >> +3.x.") > > IMHO mentioning a version of fuse is not needed. And IIUC this package > provides a python3 library, so I would also remove "supports both …". +1 >> + (home-page "https://bitbucket.org/nikratio/python-llfuse/";) >> + (license lgpl2.0))) > > It should be 'lgpl2.0+' as the LICENSE file says "or (at your option) > any later version". Yes. Leo, could you also check a few source file headers to confirm they either have the “or later” clause, or do not specify any version? > Also I think it is better to put this package in "python.scm" as it just > contains some general python library. But I'm not an expert here, so > better wait for comments of other people. Agreed. > But I would name it 'python-llfuse' and would also add 'python2-llfuse' > package (bug again: I didn't make a single python package). Right. See the convention described at <https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Python-Modules.html>. Leo, could you send an updated patch? Thanks, Ludo’.
