Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: > Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:44:06AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> I’d like to do this, but I’m pretty bad at naming things. How about a >>> new module “datastructures.scm” where this could comfortably fit in? >> >> I also did not know a good name, so did not suggest anything concrete... >> I like your suggestion; we could rename boost.scm to datastructures.scm >> and move the hash package there. >> >> What do you think? > > Boost provides not just data structures but seems to be a grab bag of > “generally useful” libraries. I’d rather leave it alone and create a > new, independent “datastructures” module with “sparsehash” as the first > occupant. > > Would that be acceptable?
Sure, let’s do that. Ludo’.
