Alex Vong <[email protected]> skribis: > According to <http://www.cpan.org/src/README.html>, > perl uses the version scheme such that maintenance branches (ready for > production use) are even numbers and development branches are odd > numbers. Thus, 5.23 is a development branch. From this page > <https://packages.debian.org/experimental/perl>, it seems Debian only > packages maintenance branches. Perhaps it is too risky to package > development branches (break a lot of things). How do you guys think?
Very good point. So I guess we’d be targeting 5.22. Does the 5.16 → 5.22 switch sound reasonable? Ludo’.
