[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Alex Vong <[email protected]> skribis: > >> According to <http://www.cpan.org/src/README.html>, >> perl uses the version scheme such that maintenance branches (ready for >> production use) are even numbers and development branches are odd >> numbers. Thus, 5.23 is a development branch. From this page >> <https://packages.debian.org/experimental/perl>, it seems Debian only >> packages maintenance branches. Perhaps it is too risky to package >> development branches (break a lot of things). How do you guys think? > > Very good point. So I guess we’d be targeting 5.22. Does the > 5.16 → 5.22 switch sound reasonable?
I went ahead with the update in ‘core-updates’, along with a couple of determinism patches (commits 4de3507 and 4187fe7.) Ludo’.
