Federico Beffa <be...@ieee.org> skribis: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Federico Beffa <be...@ieee.org> skribis: >> >>> For PDFs, it depends on the type and quality of the manual. If it is >>> short and/or poor, then nobody will spend hours reading it. But if the >>> manual is good and long, then there is a chance that people will spend >>> a lot of time reading it and it would be nice to have a good quality >>> environment to read it (again, I'm talking about font graphics >>> rendering). >> >> I agree that rendering is much better in PDF. >> >>> This is analogous to making public buildings suitable for people with >>> wheel-chairs, ... may people don't care, until they are affected :-( >> >> I disagree with the analogy. On a computer, I find it simply less >> convenient to browse PDFs than to browse Info, and that outweighs the >> better rendering quality. (As it turns out, Info is also much more >> usable for people using a Braille reader.)
[...] > It seems you don't get that my point is not about personal preferences > or feelings. It's about physical impairments (and there are plenty of > shades of grays between good sight and completely blind, where big, > good quality fonts matter). My point about Braille reader is very clearly about physical impairment. I think I do get your point. Ludo’.
