On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 09:42:43AM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:27:52AM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > >> Andreas Enge writes: > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:53:40PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > >> >> I'm assuming this was directed at me (though I don't work on Pumpa, but > >> >> I could ask the author things... I do *use* it every day though). What > >> >> am I being asked here... I'm not sure? Whether Pumpa could be updated > >> >> to QT 5? > >> > > >> > I think so :-) > >> > > >> > The alternative question would have been whether we could remove it, > >> > but I already knew the answer... > >> > > >> > Andreas > >> > >> From Sazius: > >> > >> Hi! Pumpa already works with Qt 5, I'm running it on Qt 5.3.2 in Debian > >> jessie myself. If you have any problems (e.g. with a newer version of > >> Qt) I would consider it a bug and try to fix it :-) > >> > >> So it looks like we just need to update the pacakge? > > > > The blocker is the Pumpa dependency QJson, which has a hard dependency > > on Qt-4. QJson is also used by libdbusmenu-qt. > > > > Apparently QJson's master branch has supported Qt-5 for some time, so I > > asked the maintainers if that is true, and if they plan to issue a new > > release [0]. We could try packaging from git. > > > > [0] > > https://github.com/flavio/qjson/issues/49 > > Sounds good. If they don't make a new release, I think packaging from > git is the best option.
I agree. If they don't issue a new release in the next couple of days, I will test packaging from git.
