Sorry, Chris, that I bothered you with the state of pumpa; I was so convinced that you were the packager that I did not even check! I suppose that I have read too many of your blog posts to planet gnu; whenever I hear "federation" or "pumpsomething" now, I think of you.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 09:42:43AM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > Apparently QJson's master branch has supported Qt-5 for some time, so I > > asked the maintainers if that is true, and if they plan to issue a new > > release [0]. We could try packaging from git. > > https://github.com/flavio/qjson/issues/49 Thanks for the initiative! > Sounds good. If they don't make a new release, I think packaging from > git is the best option. I am not a big fan of packaging from non-release versions. Maybe you could convince upstream that this is enough of an exciting change to make a release, Leo? In the end, it is probably more interesting and important to get rid of Qt-4 than to not package from git. But there are still other packages requiring Qt-4. Maybe we should wait a bit until their number is more reduced, and then take a joint decision for the remaining ones. Andreas
