David Craven <da...@craven.ch> writes:
> I can help fixing package regressions if someone gets the ball
> rolling. Is there a reason to upgrade to gcc 5 or does it make sense
> to jump to gcc 6 directly? If I understand correctly most of the work
> required for an update to gcc 5 has already been done?
Until the bootstrapping problem on ARM is fixed, we can't do any of
this. At the moment, that's blocking us from even updating to 4.9.4,
nevermind 5 or 6. If you want to help us upgrade our default GCC,
investigating that problem would be the best way.
Mark
