l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
[...] >> For the record, this is how far I got with GCC 5: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399 > > I’ve made some progress on this, as reported on bugzilla. I’m now > trying to bisect the issue; however, since the bootstrapping failure of > gcc-final is due to a problem that manifests in gcc-boot0, that’s a lot > of rebuild, and the machine I’m using (redhill) is slow. > > Anyway, we’ll have a patch reverting a few 4.9.3-to-4.9.4 commits, and > that’ll allow us to proceed. I’d like to reduce that patch as much as > possible, but I’d like to stop researching by the end of next week so we > can then freeze core-updates. ‘core-updates’ is now building with a tiny patch on gcc-4.9 (in fact it’s enough to apply it to gcc-cross-boot0, which is interesting): https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399#c12 Ludo’.