On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 08:20:26PM +1000, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
> I'm not a fan of "quickswitch-for-i3" and "python-i3-py". Perhaps a
> better solution is to ensure "i3-py" in the description or synopsis so
> that `guix package -s' finds it. As for quickswitch, isn't the upstream
> name also simply "quickswitch-i3"?
Our packaging guidelines say that we should use the "project name chosen
upstream" , which in this case appears to be quickswitch-for-i3 .
And python-i3-py does follow our conventions for naming Python modules