Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Roel! > > I realized we have not applied this --list-generations patch of yours, > which is a pity. So… > > Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> skribis: > >> Vincent Legoll writes: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> --list-generations=full >>>>> >>>>> I think keeping a way to see all generations in one go would be cool >>>> >>>> --list-generations would still display all the generations. Or did you >>>> mean “a way to see *the content* of each generation”? >>> >>> I'm not sure to understand what you mean by "the content", what I meant >>> was to keep what current guix package -l shows us, i.e. do not alter current >>> UI, only add new things, but do not break existing practices when not >>> mandated. >> >> What about adding a `--no-diff-format' or a `--diff-format' argument to >> `--list-generations'? >> >> We could then make two choices: Default to the proposed diff format, or >> default to the full format (what we have now). Depending on what we >> choose as default, we can implement the appropriate negating argument. >> >> I would prefer defaulting to the diff format.. > > In the discussion that ensued, it seems there was a consensus to provide > only the diff format: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00385.html > > So it seems all the lights are green. :-) Let me know if there’s > anything we should do to help!
Thanks for the reminder. I seem to have a lot to finish up :-). I will work out the arguments and post a new version of the patch for final review. Kind regards, Roel Janssen