Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:24:15AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > Is there are reason for not using guile-rsvg and guile-cairo? Otherwise
>> > I think it would be preferable (they’d need to be autoloaded so that
>> > ‘make’ doesn’t fail when they’re missing, but that’s OK.)
>> >
>> > I found an example that Andy had posted:
>> >
>> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-08/msg00753.html
>>
>> I hacked this a little bit a pushed as
>> ffde82c9ecf99524220e463055f4f18c8c9e7a81.
>
> A welcome change! But I think it needs a little more time in the
> kitchen:
>
> $ guix pull
[...]
> In unknown file:
> ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f "~A ~S" ("no code for module" (rsvg)) #f]
>
> ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
> ERROR: no code for module (rsvg)
Indeed it wasn’t fully cooked. ;-) I see your message just now, but
others reported it on IRC and it got fixed in
8ce84bf1f5705f5280e8bf8f150ec2e859b045ee.
Ludo’.
