What about use debian's org.tar?
At 2017-07-18 20:40:17, "ng0" <n...@infotropique.org> wrote: >Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.2K bytes: >> Hello, >> >> tumashu <tuma...@163.com> skribis: >> >> > the first thing is improve font-build-system to support split package easy >> >> Good point, though I think we also need to find out how we would split >> it, which may not be that simple. >> >> Ludo’. >> >> >noto-cjk is offered in different packages and blends: >https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk >noto itself is offered on the website in many different >blends aswell: >https://www.google.com/get/noto/ > >By the way, this is totally unversioned. Is our only way >to know that noto has been updated by our package reporting >a hash missmatch? Looks to me like it is. >Should we store the fonts somewhere versioned as a fallback? >-- >ng0 >GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 >GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys >https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
