On Tue 29 Aug 2017 09:44, Caleb Ristvedt <[email protected]> writes:
> <Digression> I found myself checking the guile reference quite > frequently. One time I happened upon a part describing the ECMAScript > implementation (curiosity and all that), and noticed that several times > it was mentioned how irresponsible the implementor was. That scared me > probably more than it should have. By all objective criteria, I have > failed in this project, and it frightens me to think that, nice as the > community is, I could screw up badly enough to end up a footnote > somewhere as an example of what not to be. That fear pretty much sums up > my mental state during the second half of the summer.</Digression> LOL I wrote that about myself :-) As in, the ECMAScript implementation was mostly mine, and its faults were mine, and I documented that and moved on. It would be nice to fix some day but it takes time; in the meantime I just wanted to moderate peoples' expectations. Apologies if that language made you feel intimidated, the intention was precisely the opposite. Happy hacking! :-) Andy
