Heya, Andreas Enge <[email protected]> skribis:
> I have a probably naïve question, since I did not follow the project closely: > Instead of an all-or-nothing outcome, success or failure, merge or bit rot, > would it be possible to set up an incremental update path? > Use some of your scheme code to replace part of the C++ daemon? > Maybe write a high-level scheme engine that shells out to C++ functions in > the current daemon, that could gradually be replaced by chunks of your code? I like this idea. One of the first things reepca worked on was writing a replacement for the ‘guix-register’ C++ program in Scheme, which also provides the foundation for everything else on that branch. I think we should be able to merge this bit independently of the rest, as a first step. It requires care, but that’s definitely something we should look into. Thanks, Ludo’.
