Hi Malcolm,
> I entirely agree that with the right educational materials you are
> going to see have the possibility of appealing to other
> groups/cultures/biases.
Yes, I think that does make sense.
> Having a section for each of the 2**3 type of user might be the
> perfect compromise.
>
> Perhaps try to appeal to each audience not with "the first foo to bar"
> language, but rather the language of use cases, such as:
>
> As an administrator of a general purpose HPC cluster, I can focus on
> networking optimizations ("the last mile", I/O, CUDA, performance,
> permissions, interesting massively parallel etc) rather than keeping
> up-to-date with every last scientific application.
>
> Guix's garbage collection capabilities remove the guess-work from
> deleting "old" versions of libraries from my installation!
>
> As an system administrator, solving the dependency hell of end-user
> applications should not be my problem! Guix puts this problem where
> it belongs - in the hand of application specialists.
>
> As an sysadmin administrator, with guix I am removed from the
> politics of when to update an application!
>
> Documenting what applications are installed used to be a separate
> problem from that of installing them. With GUIX, performing the
> installation makes them appear in my software catalog. No more
> worries about inconsistencies!
(It’s “Guix”, not “GUIX”. People at work also always write “GUIX” and I
can’t figure out why… Maybe we should come up with a backronym to make
it a valid alternative spelling :))
> As a user of advanced scientific applications, I am now in a position
> to deploy which applications I need as I see fit, and have the upstream
> community support to share the tooling.
>
> As a bioinformatics developer, the same tools I use to install
> application environments can be used to deploy advanced workflows with the
> same level of confidence.
>
> Does this strike a sweet spot?
I like these testimonial style descriptions, and I think it makes sense
to add separate sections for different archetypical users. (We already
have a related section entitled “GuixSD and GNU Guix in your field”,
which I found intriguing, but it only links to blog posts with certain
tags.)
However, I think that this is tangential to the question of whether to
move the GuixSD description and intro to a separate page. If we added
those sections they’d be only about Guix, not about GuixSD, no?
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
