Hello Marius & all, Marius Bakke <[email protected]> skribis:
> Good idea. It would be good to clarify that this also applies for > 'staging'. What do you think about this instead? > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > doc/contributing.texi | 11 +++++++++-- The patch LGTM! > +@c TODO: It would be good with badges on the website that tracks these > +@c branches. Or maybe even a status page. I agree! I admit I sometimes have a hard time determining the current status of every branch (for instance I’m not sure what’s up with ‘staging’ at the moment…) Perhaps a lo-tech thing would be to have more frequent reminders on the mailing list of the status of each branch, also as a way to solicitate contributions on these branches. I really think we need to have someone responsible for those rebuild cycles, and to arrange to hand over reponsibilities to a different person after each cycle or so. Thanks, Ludo’.
