Hello Leo! > Just to future-proof this table, instead of having "is this package > up > to date?", let's rather use "packaged version". Perhaps we could > even > use separate columns for master, staging and core-updates. This is > especially valuable considering that we are currently on 3.30 rather > than 3.32 or 3.34, making all of those values 0 by definition.
That's a good idea. Thanks! Regards, RG.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
