Hi, On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 18:56, Leo Famulari <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:34:34PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > > The question is: should the next release 1.2.1 contain [email protected] as > > graft? Or do we revert the commit and simply fix it on core-updates > > and wait for the next core-updates cycle. Personally, I am in favor > > of the latter. WDYT? > > The release should not contain any grafts, if we can help it. > > On the wip-next-release branch, I've simply updated zstd to 1.4.9:
I guess that it will not build for i686. Does it? If not, the patch attached to the previous email tweaks the offending test; as the original author of zstd has suggested: <https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/2528#issuecomment-794704882> (Thanks to the other Leo for opening the issue.) Well, I am confused. If the update of zstd from 1.4.4 to 1.4.9 does not imply a huge rebuild, why is it a graft? And not a simple update? Cheers, simon
