Le 16 février 2023 12:03:35 GMT+01:00, Efraim Flashner <[email protected]> a écrit : >On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:19:08PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > >> Is it necessary to keep all these version of openjdk and to bootstrap >> version n with version n-1? > >Probably? I assume if you can cut some out that'd be ok. I'm pretty sure >openjdk-11 and openjdk-17 are considered LTS by upstream so it would >make sense to keep those specifically. Upstream ensures openjdk N+1 can be built by openjdk N, but not necessarily with N-1. We can try :)
- Re: Architecture support Andreas Enge
- Re: Architecture support [was: Re: Mer... Christopher Baines
- Re: Architecture support [was: Re: Merging... Efraim Flashner
- Re: Architecture support [was: Re: Mer... Andreas Enge
- Re: Merging core-updates? Andreas Enge
- Re: Merging core-updates? Efraim Flashner
- Re: Merging core-updates? Andreas Enge
- Re: Merging core-updates? Andreas Enge
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates... Andreas Enge
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-up... Efraim Flashner
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging cor... Julien Lepiller
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging cor... Andreas Enge
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging cor... Andreas Enge
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging cor... Andreas Enge
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging cor... Andreas Enge
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging cor... Kaelyn
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging cor... Andreas Enge
- Re: Merging core-updates? Maxime Devos
- Re: Merging core-updates? Andreas Enge
- Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?) Andreas Enge
- Re: Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?) Andreas Enge
