Hi, ------- Original Message ------- On Friday, February 17th, 2023 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote:
> Am Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 03:49:19PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: > > > Hm, I compiled up to openjdk@13, @14 fails with the message below. > > This is strange. It looks as if the patch that has become obsolete, > > because integrated into the source @13, is needed again @14! > > And then @15, the patch is again already integrated into the source code. > > Very weird! > > > Things become totally crazy. > So far I have compiled @13 without the patch, @14 with the patch, > @15 without the patch, and @16 seems to need it again. Is this an > odd/even thing? Are there spring and autumn versions of openjdk with > different release teams? Hi, I don't know much about openjdk or its development process, but I had one possible thought about the pattern of patch application. Was it a patch that was applied or backported to existing openjdk releases, and are @14 and @16 the latest releases of those series? At least to me as a naive outside observer, the patch being needed for some of the older release branches but not others sounds like a patch applied to multiple existing release branches, with openjdk@14 and @16 being at older point releases from prior to the patch being applied upstream. HTH! (And I apologize for the noise if not!) Cheers, Kaelyn > Well, in @17, @18 and @19 the patch seems to be definitely integrated > into the source code. > > Andreas
