Hi Felix, Felix Lechner <felix.lech...@lease-up.com> writes:
> Hi Maxim, > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:26 PM Maxim Cournoyer > <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> rebasing causes the PGP-signed commits to be resigned with the key of >> the people of does the rebase, which obfuscates the origin seal >> somewhat. >> >> I think we should continue to prefer merging > > Let's take your argument all the way for a moment, please. What if the > signed merge commits were to serve as the mutual approvals Ludo' has > been asking for? I'm not sure how that'd work, since Git only allows a single PGP signature per commit, as far as I can tell. When you rewrite the history (by using rebase, say), the existing signatures of the rewritten (rebased) commits are replaced with new ones generated from your key. -- Thanks, Maxim
