> - either not snapshotting the rootfs / at all, with the hypothesis that
>   we get it back entirely from config files. Is that possible ? Is there
>   information in / (I think of /etc in particular) that is saved, not
>   temporary and not managed by guix system that would justify that we
>   want to snapshot / at all?
>   This would allow to simply care about only a few "user data"
>   directories, and be sure to not miss anything when there's a need to
>   restore the state.
>
> I can't find easily a case of successful use of the second
> configuration, but would be glad to find one, as well as some discussion
> about what would be a recommended way to secure the state beyond
> dotfiles.

I've found some equivalent information on the NixOS side here :
https://nixos.wiki/wiki/Impermanence

Some (rare) directories indeed seem that would better be saved because
their information is useful for the system, in the case of NixOS, it
seems to be "/etc/nixos", "/etc/NetworkManager" (for system
connections), "/var/log", "/var/lib".

However, I have much more files that aren't linked in the store,
especially in the /etc directory (at least 20 files). 

Has anybody tried to do something like this on Guix?
    
-- 
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves

  • btrfs recommended... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
    • Re: btrfs re... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
      • Re: btrf... Efraim Flashner
      • Re: btrf... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
        • Re: ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
        • Re: ... Efraim Flashner
        • Re: ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
          • ... Andrew Tropin
    • Re: btrfs re... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.

Reply via email to