On 8/21/23 11:53 AM, Felix Lechner wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:11 AM Katherine Cox-Buday
<cox.katherin...@gmail.com> wrote:
the immediate emphasis should be on making bringing
our Go ecosystem onto a supported version of Go
 From my experience of packaging Gocryptfs in Debian and here, perhaps
some reconsideration should be given to the widely unpopular idea of
using more package functions in Guix. Ending in asterisks, they would
allow packagers, and perhaps even automated tools, to select exactly
the particular versions or commits specified for each prerequisite in
go.mod.
I have questions about this, but for now, I'm going to try and keep bringing the conversation back to just getting our ecosystem compiling on a supported version of Go.

  • Updates for Go Katherine Cox-Buday
    • Re: Updates ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
      • Re: Upda... Katherine Cox-Buday
        • Re: ... Wilko Meyer
          • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
          • ... Attila Lendvai
            • ... Katherine Cox-Buday
          • ... Katherine Cox-Buday
            • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
              • ... Katherine Cox-Buday
              • ... Josselin Poiret
                • ... Attila Lendvai
                • ... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
                • ... Katherine Cox-Buday
                • ... wolf
                • ... Katherine Cox-Buday
            • ... Wilko Meyer
        • Re: ... david larsson
          • ... Katherine Cox-Buday
    • Re: Updates ... John Kehayias

Reply via email to