On 9/24/23 1:27 AM, Andy Tai wrote:
Hi, curious if core-updates still a thing? There seems a branch by that name and the manual still says patches causing large number of rebuilds should go to core-updates, at least for these not aiming at a specific feature branch.
I have the same question.
My understanding is that feature-branches are now the canonical way to work on things, and core-updates has become just another kind of feature-branch for landing groups of large changes that don't really fit anywhere; the difference being that it's now more ephemeral and "as needed" instead of the default for large changes.
Do I have that right? I guess we need to update the manual?
