Hi Katherine, Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherin...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 9/24/23 1:27 AM, Andy Tai wrote: >> Hi, curious if core-updates still a thing? There seems a branch by >> that name and the manual still says patches causing large number of >> rebuilds should go to core-updates, at least for these not aiming at a >> specific feature branch. > I have the same question. > > My understanding is that feature-branches are now the canonical way to > work on things, and core-updates has become just another kind of > feature-branch for landing groups of large changes that don't really > fit anywhere; the difference being that it's now more ephemeral and > "as needed" instead of the default for large changes. > > Do I have that right? > > I guess we need to update the manual? I think that's right! Clarifications to the manual would be welcome. -- Thanks, Maxim
