On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 08:38:14PM -0500, Suhail Singh wrote: > If it works as expected, great. If it doesn't, it doesn't seem likely > we'd be switching back to the status quo - we may switch to yet-another > process, perhaps. I.e., once we make the move, it's an effective point > of no return. For such moves, it's worth doing some thinking and > analysis _prior_ to the change. I believe that this is what the GCD > intended to achieve. I am merely pointing out some blind-spots in the > presented analysis.
Right, that makes sense. I think this GCD will take some time to "shake out". For one thing, we haven't even formally adopted the GCD process yet! So I'm sure there is still a lot of discussion and clarifications to perform before a decision can be reached. I guess my perspective is that we have 2 basic choices: email, or a web site. I've mainly been thinking about Codeberg generically as a "web site" option, and not the specifics of Codeberg itself. Thanks for helping me see that.
