Hi Leo, On Thu, May 08 2025, Leo Famulari wrote:
> [if] we had two of these [...] and took their responsibilities as > facilitators very seriously. Based on my reading of the group dynamics, you, futurile, nckx, or ieure would all have favorable personalities for that role (and others, too). Sorry I didn't check with any of you. Being less serious is probably okay, too. Anyone could privately circulate ideas for new branch names. It would save the effort to date and recognize that a substantial portion of the project wanted a new name. One-on-one deal-making would probably be best. It avoids grandstanding. I would start working with the folks who vetoed. Please do it for Lily! Kind regards, Felix P.S. Thank you, futurile, for the clarifications!
