>dim. 21 sept. 2025 at 10:46, Steve George <[email protected]> wrote:
I’d say that when you contribute a new package, you’re more or less expected to take care of it afterwards. > [0] My personal opinion is we have far too many already and both developers > and users > would be better off with a more focused set. And that we should implement the > ArchLinux > like user community repository which would provide a place for a wider set. > [1] https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/fwknop#default, Regarding this point, remember that ancillary channels (Aur like) would’n benefit from substitutes, unless you set up a dedicated server. That being said, and being an Arch user, I tend to agree: core + extra packages to concentrate on in priority (part of releases), with user (mostly leaf) packages on top of that, with support of the community. Otherwise, it is beyond my understanding how to keep the pace on keeping up to date 30k packages, which roughly means 30k commits per month. C.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
