Hi, Far from me the proposal to hold any horses. Please shot your contributions whenever people want or have the time.
On Fri, 07 Nov 2025 at 15:03, Ekaitz Zarraga <[email protected]> wrote: > Idk. I see what Simon is trying to do here and I like it. But as I said > in the past in this ML, this we might need to re-think as something more > global that solves the root issue: (re)moved variables. My email originated inside two points: (1) It’s about a very specific kind of contribution: package removal. (2) The concrete package removal workflow is still under discussion. Considering this, my email is a friendly request: In the meantime while (2) isn’t fully discussed, shared or well-adopted etc., it’ll be kind for some of us to avoid to push package removal on Friday (and Saturday). What I’m asking isn’t to write in stone something, just to consider that package removal is a specific contribution that has implications on third-party channel, so it would be friendly to take into consideration all this. It would just make smoother the hard labour life of some of us paid for working on Guix. ;-) Considering a longer term, being friendly with third-party channels might be beneficial for the whole project, IMHO. That’s all. Cheers, simon
