Re,

Doing my homework. :-)

On Fri, 15 May 2026 at 17:19, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote:

> * Debian
>   https://lwn.net/Articles/1020968/ (May 2025)

I think this one is also worth <https://lwn.net/Articles/1061544/>
(March 10, 2026).

> * FreeBSD
>   
> https://www.heise.de/en/news/FreeBSD-policy-AI-generated-source-code-No-thanks-10634141.html

Quoting this website about IT news.:

        The official wording in the current status report for the second
        quarter of 2025 can be found under "Policy on generative AI
        created code and documentation": "Core is currently
        investigating the establishment of a policy for the use of LLM
        (including, but not limited to, the generation of code). The
        result will be added to the Contributors Guide in the document
        repository.

And indeed it’s what I read in FreeBSD Report Second Quarter
<https://www.freebsd.org/status/report-2025-04-2025-06/>.

Therefore, it appears to me better to directly point to official FreeBSD
material.  However, I’m not able to find this FreeBSD policy.  I mean,
it’s one year old now, so what is the output of their investigation?

If there is currently no output, mentioning FreeBSD here is misleading
and thus it should be removed.

However, it appears to me worth to mention NetBSD which makes it clear
<https://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html>.


> * LLVM
>   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/docs/AIToolPolicy.md

To me, considering the Pledge, the item #2 is still unclear.  I propose
to clarify by reusing “Extractive Contributions” from LLVM policy.  For
instance,

  2. We kindly ask contributors to respect this choice and not use LLMs
         for their contributions to Guix.  Nevertheless, code claimed to
         be produced in whole or in part by genAI **may be incorporated
         if the contributor has a valid copyright claim on the code**
         and if the contribution isn’t some extractive contributions.

Where “Extractive Contributions” would be detailed in a specific
subsection outside the Pledge.  Well, something also reusing the
Accountability from Mastodon
<https://github.com/mastodon/.github/blob/main/AI_POLICY.md>.


Cheers,
simon

Reply via email to