Hi, > “AI” itself is not clearly defined, and “LLMs” are only a little better.
The whole "humans versus machines" idea is flawed. Many people already use machines (full of chips) as part of their bodies or daily lives: pacemakers, insulin pumps, cochlear implants, robotic limbs, eye trackers, speech-to-text tools, and brain-computer interfaces. If someone like Stephen Hawking sent us a patch using eye tracking, speech-to-text, a robotic arm, or a brain-computer interface, would it be rejected as insufficiently "human"? Cheers, Bost
