Hi Hugo, On Fri, 22 May 2026 at 23:38, Hugo Buddelmeijer via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." <[email protected]> wrote:
> - genAI was used by a team member, thus 'by the project'. > - The genAI only investigated, but did not write any code. > - A very minimal change was made, by hand, based on the genAI analysis. > - The genAI corrected my theory of the software (see below). Let be honest. If this scenario is “forbidden“ then one will just silently do it thus breaching their pledge booo. Well, similarly the project values free software and “forbids” non-free. Guess what? Most if not all my contributions to Guix had be done and will still probably be done using a machine that runs non-free stuff. Booo! That’s why I think pledge 1. needs to polish the wording; see my proposal on the draft v2 in [1]. > - It probably saved energy compared to by-human investigation. Could we drop this item without the loss of the core of your valid example above? Because as I underlined in [2], at scale, it does not save resource as current numbers from international agencies show. Cheers, simon 1: Re: Submitting GCD 008: “Standing up for human crafting” Simon Tournier <[email protected]> Sat, 23 May 2026 00:52:28 +0200 id:[email protected] 2: Re: How about P.R.s were no code was written with genAI? Simon Tournier <[email protected]> Fri, 22 May 2026 16:53:50 +0200 id:[email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-05 https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]
