On 6/2/26 2:23 PM, Noé Lopez wrote:
I think we can push our existing users to prefer AGit. But that seems
complicated for new users, as I said they would not benefit from web
interface and PR template. Which were IMO the most important benefits of
coming to Codeberg.
I also want to add, that as a regular contributor, I still prefer pull
requests to AGit for the same reasons.
But… I don’t want to block things, and 750MiB per fork is huge. I really
wish that we could find another path forward though.
Is it possible to improve AGit so that posting the PR is still done on
the web interface? In that case, I think it would be no big problem.
To be clear, we won't make forking absolutely impossible. We do want to
communicate that AGit is a option and, from our experience, can replace
fork workflow for a good amount of cases.
I think blocking this on getting web interface via AGit is reasonable,
there's luckily a issue for that [1] and I've commented on it to get the
discussion started again.
[1]: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2381
Kind Regards
Gusted
Codeberg e.V.
--
https://codeberg.org
Codeberg e.V. – Arminiusstraße 2-4 – 10551 Berlin – Germany
Registered at registration court Amtsgericht Charlottenburg VR36929.
