Gusted <[email protected]> writes: > On 6/2/26 2:23 PM, Noé Lopez wrote: >> I think we can push our existing users to prefer AGit. But that seems >> complicated for new users, as I said they would not benefit from web >> interface and PR template. Which were IMO the most important benefits of >> coming to Codeberg. >> >> I also want to add, that as a regular contributor, I still prefer pull >> requests to AGit for the same reasons. >> >> But… I don’t want to block things, and 750MiB per fork is huge. I really >> wish that we could find another path forward though. >> >> Is it possible to improve AGit so that posting the PR is still done on >> the web interface? In that case, I think it would be no big problem. > > To be clear, we won't make forking absolutely impossible. We do want to > communicate that AGit is a option and, from our experience, can replace > fork workflow for a good amount of cases. > > I think blocking this on getting web interface via AGit is reasonable, > there's luckily a issue for that [1] and I've commented on it to get the > discussion started again. >
Thanks for getting that ball rolling! > [1]: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2381 > Kind Regards > Gusted > Codeberg e.V. > > -- > https://codeberg.org > Codeberg e.V. – Arminiusstraße 2-4 – 10551 Berlin – Germany > Registered at registration court Amtsgericht Charlottenburg VR36929.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
