On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 6:03 AM Cayetano Santos <[email protected]> wrote: > > >lun. 06 juil. 2026 at 22:45, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Cayetano Santos <[email protected]> skribis: > > > >> A minor point, we mentioned at some point during the discussion. > >> > >> In "GenAI use disclosure" we’d rather avoid trailers with reference to > >> concrete genAI implementations, as this is irrelevant, and would > >> contribute to advertising them. > > > > Are you saying that “GenAI use disclosure” should explicitly ask to > > *not* use Git trailers such as ‘Assisted-by’? > > Quite the opposite: it is important to clearly state the context of the > contribution. I’m personally fine with a git trailer. > > Now, a couple of times during the (long) exchange, it was mentioned that > we’d rather avoid making explicit the *concrete* tool at hand: Claude, > Pierre or Paul, its version, brand, colour or the company behind are > all irrelevant details, and would only contribute to advertise its > usage. Generic trailers are more than enough.
Cayetano, Could you provide an example or two of a generic trailer? I believe the goal was for the disclosure to inform "the project will keep working to **provide people of all levels of experience with the resources to use Guix and to contribute to Guix** without feeling the need to resort to genAI". So it's more than identifying contributions using AI, but instead providing sufficient detail to improve the documentation, tools, etc. Greg
