>mar. 07 juil. 2026 at 12:16, Greg Hogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 6:03 AM Cayetano Santos <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >lun. 06 juil. 2026 at 22:45, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi! >> > >> > Cayetano Santos <[email protected]> skribis: >> > >> >> A minor point, we mentioned at some point during the discussion. >> >> >> >> In "GenAI use disclosure" we’d rather avoid trailers with reference to >> >> concrete genAI implementations, as this is irrelevant, and would >> >> contribute to advertising them. >> > >> > Are you saying that “GenAI use disclosure” should explicitly ask to >> > *not* use Git trailers such as ‘Assisted-by’? >> >> Quite the opposite: it is important to clearly state the context of the >> contribution. I’m personally fine with a git trailer. >> >> Now, a couple of times during the (long) exchange, it was mentioned that >> we’d rather avoid making explicit the *concrete* tool at hand: Claude, >> Pierre or Paul, its version, brand, colour or the company behind are >> all irrelevant details, and would only contribute to advertise its >> usage. Generic trailers are more than enough. > > Cayetano, > > Could you provide an example or two of a generic trailer? The trailer itself is unchanged¹: "Assisted-by AI", "Co-Authored-By AI", "Suggested-by AI", "Reviewed-by AI", or any other. The key point here is the word "AI" (or genAI, or LLM). C. [1] https://github.com/magit/magit/blob/caf37d0d608c14a8bca53ffa57675d5756e6c0b9/lisp/git-commit.el#L910
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
