Am Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 02:59:40PM +0000 schrieb Greg Hogan: > The GCD process does not preclude the project from temporarily > rejecting LLM-authored legally significant contributions while waiting > on legal guidance from the GNU Foundation. This is a perfectly > reasonable step to take while we improve our tracking of copyright > status. This would need to be added to the user documentation and pull > request template.
In the absence of consensus, who would be legitimate to add non- consensual regulations to the manual? I would argue that this would need another GCD, since the topic is controversial; and then we perfectly go in circles. > There has been no effort to build consensus. This is offensive to the author of the GCD. On the contrary, I think he has expended a lot of effort trying to reach consensus and to take the different contributions and opinions expressed on this list and on Codeberg into account. The GCD has changed a lot over the discussion, as well as in form (for instance the motivation section) as in content (the concrete provisions). Now this may or may not have succeeded (the deliberation phase will tell), but it is definitely not for want of effort. Andreas
